United States v. Adham Amin Hassoun

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that proving the commission of an offense enumerated in § 2339A “does not require proof that the defendant provided material support or resources”
• noting that “one who has been indicted as a principal may be convicted on evidence showing that he merely aided and abetted the commission of the offense” (quotation omitted) (emphasis added)
• “As we hope to make clear in this opinion, the district court’s fact-based analysis is inapplicable here; our precedent has since distinguished Marable, limiting its holding to, at most, cases in which two counts are charged under the same conspiracy statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).