United States v. John Lee Molinaro, United States of America v. Donald P. Mangano, Sr., United States of America v. Donald P. Mangano, Sr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that filling in box 12b with wage loss claim “would have fulfilled the jurisdictional requirement of providing a sum certain for his claim”
• reasoning the jury could not have been confused when viewing the instructions in the context of the whole trial
• upholding conviction under § 1344 when bank owner concealed facts that would have made regulators “frown” 52 UNITED STATES V. YATES and that “would excite the Board’s interest and invite closer scrutiny of [the bank’s] solvency”
• sufficient evidence of intent where jury could infer defendant coordinated and structured transactions to protect himself and conceal his interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).