Skip to main content
· 3/17/2005

United States v. Platte

Citations

  • 401 F.3d 1176
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 4458
  • 2005 WL 615865

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reaffirming our holding in Haddock, and noting that while such a good-faith instruction may be redundant with the fraud offense’s intent element, our circuit requires a separate good faith instruction
  • addressing 18 U.S.C. § 2155(a), which prohibits “willfully” damaging national defense material
  • “Cheek drew a sharp distinction between a mistake of law negating willfulness and a studied disagreement with the law.”
  • “[t]he high-minded motives of Defendants do not negate their intent [I]f the law being violated is constitutional, the worthiness of one’s motives cannot excuse the violation in the eyes of the law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartz, Anderson, Tymkovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.