Skip to main content
· 9/5/1991

United States v. Edward E. Dockray

Citations

  • 943 F.2d 152
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 20868
  • 1991 WL 169287

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Holding that Cheek is unique to tax evasion cases since the willfulness requirement in tax evasion cases \is not synonymous with the intent to defraud requirement in the mail and wire fraud statutes.\
  • holding that good faith is an \absolute defense\ to mail and wire fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Bownes, Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.