Skip to main content
· 6/14/2007

United States v. Kimberly Prude

Citations

  • 489 F.3d 873
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 13905
  • 2007 WL 1704103

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • to establish that error affected his substantial rights, defendant must show that result of proceeding would have been different but for error
  • “We review a district court’s refusal to give a theory of defense instruction de novo.”
  • on plain error review defendant bears burden of showing that his substantial rights were affected in the sense that the result of the proceeding would have been different but for the error
  • on plain error review defendant bears burden of showing that his substantial rights were affected in the sense that the result of the proceeding would have been different but for the error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Ripple, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.