Skip to main content
· 7/25/2008

United States v. Iglesias

Citations

  • 535 F.3d 150
  • 77 Fed. R. Serv. 141
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 15830
  • 2008 WL 2853361

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the proximity factor weighed in favor of conviction when the gun in question was stored in a briefcase in the same room as a small amount of methamphetamine and the same house as a large quantity
  • holding that ‘‘when a witness who testifies frankly under oath subject to cross-examination only two days later states that he now ‘can’t answer the question’ and is otherwise evasive and vague, a district court may find that these statements are inconsistent’’
  • holding objection that the best evidence available is on the witness stand did not preserve a hearsay objection to introduction of the witness’s prior statement
  • holding objection that “the best evidence available is on the witness stand” did not preserve a hearsay objection to introduction of the witness’s prior statement
  • explaining that a party fails to preserve an evidentiary issue for appeal by making the wrong objection
  • holding objection that “the best evidence available is on the witness stand” did not preserve a hearsay objection to introduction of the witness’s prior statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fisher, Hardiman, Aldisert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.