United States v. Victor E. Robbins, Sr., A/K/A Gene, Roy G. Robbins, A/K/A Gordon, and James Herriman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied a continuance to accommodate defense counsel’s tardiness in reviewing discovery
• concluding that defense attacks on witness credibility invited prosecutor’s attempt to “right the scale”
• finding that visible expression of impatience by author of this opinion did not deny defendants a fair trial
• finding that visible expression of impatience by author of this opinion did not deny defendants a fair trial
• affirming denial of motion to continue where the defendants “did not identify any specific material prejudice they suffered” from the denial
• affirming denial of motion to continue where the defendants “did not identify any specific material prejudice they suffered” from the de- nial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).