Skip to main content
· 2/8/1989

United States v. Charles H. Grier and Isaac Harper

Citations

  • 866 F.2d 908

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Relying upon absence of infringement of substantive rights as a sufficient basis for holding that alleged criminal discovery violation was not reversible error
  • parties to recorded conversations were properly identified based, in part, on fact that the calls were made to the defendant’s home

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Wood, Coffey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.