United States v. Shelia Swan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an objection raised for the first time in a motion for a mistrial or new trial is not timely
• noting that an objection raised for the first time in a motion for a mistrial or new trial is not timely
• noting that an ˜‹“ŽŒ’˜—ȱ›Š’œŽȱ˜›ȱ‘Žȱꛜȱ’–Žȱ’—ȱŠȱ–˜’˜—ȱ˜›ȱŠȱ–’œ›’Š•ȱ˜›ȱ new trial is not timely
• noting that an ˜‹“ŽŒ’˜—ȱ›Š’œŽȱ˜›ȱ‘Žȱꛜȱ’–Žȱ’—ȱŠȱ–˜’˜—ȱ˜›ȱŠȱ–’œ›’Š•ȱ˜›ȱ new trial is not timely
• “[I]t is the exclusive function of the jury to determine the credibility of the witnesses and draw reasonable inferences.”
• “We have previously held that ‘[a]n attorney may be the agent of his client for purposes of Rule 801(d)(2)(D).’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).