Skip to main content
First Circuit· 6/27/1984

United States v. Rush

Citations

  • 738 F.2d 497

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that time beyond the thirty-day under-advisement period can be excluded if there is some other \source of excludable time such as an 'ends of justice' continuance\
  • \[I]t is not necessary for the court to articulate the basic facts when they are obvious and set forth in a motion for a continuance.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bownes, Coffin, Pettine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

112 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

64 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Rush

26 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.