First Circuit· 6/27/1984
United States v. Rush
Citations
- 738 F.2d 497
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- suggesting that time beyond the thirty-day under-advisement period can be excluded if there is some other \source of excludable time such as an 'ends of justice' continuance\
- \[I]t is not necessary for the court to articulate the basic facts when they are obvious and set forth in a motion for a continuance.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bownes, Coffin, Pettine
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
112 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court· 1990-04-17· cited 2,569×
- United States v. Frank Peter Balistrieri, Steve Disalvo, and Dennis Librizzi, DefendantsSeventh Circuit· 1985-11-26· cited 284×
- O Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao Do Vegetal v. AshcroftTenth Circuit· 2004-11-12· cited 237×
- United States v. Rojas-ContrerasSupreme Court· 1985-12-16· cited 177×
- United States v. Alan N. ScottFirst Circuit· 2001-10-30· cited 154×
- United States v. Bruce Derek Spring AKA Bruce Derek WallsTenth Circuit· 1996-04-02· cited 135×
- United States v. William MontoyaSeventh Circuit· 1987-08-18· cited 124×
- United States v. Santiago-BecerrilFirst Circuit· 1997-11-20· cited 120×
- United States v. William Bull Pringle, Iii, United States of America v. James Crawford McAfee United States of America v. Lloyd Cowan ParkerFirst Circuit· 1985-01-14· cited 107×
- United States v. Kenneth L. ThomasSeventh Circuit· 1986-06-06· cited 96×
- United States v. Stacey Lynn Merkt and John B. ElderFifth Circuit· 1986-07-17· cited 96×
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1992-11-05· cited 92×
- United States v. Scott David LattanyThird Circuit· 1993-01-26· cited 88×
- United States v. Manuel Vasquez and Jose Pollo RenteriaSecond Circuit· 1990-11-02· cited 85×
- United States v. Stephen Joseph WalkerFirst Circuit· 1991-01-10· cited 85×
- United States v. James Tunnessen, Douglas Fullerton, and Michael Robert Reape, DefendantsSecond Circuit· 1985-05-24· cited 79×
- United States v. Glen Butz Danner L. BooneNinth Circuit· 1993-01-08· cited 71×
- United States v. Angel Torres LopezFirst Circuit· 1988-08-22· cited 69×
- United States v. Mobile Materials, Inc. And Gerald O. PhilpotTenth Circuit· 1989-03-22· cited 63×
- United States v. Geraldo Rodriguez, A/K/A Jose RodriguezFirst Circuit· 1995-08-28· cited 61×
Cites
64 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1940-05-20· cited 3,669×
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-05-19· cited 1,672×
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court· 1982-02-23· cited 834×
- Braunfeld v. BrownSupreme Court· 1961-05-29· cited 657×
- United States v. Herman Mers, Lester Mers, Randy James Myers, Paul J. FerranteEleventh Circuit· 1983-03-21· cited 182×
- United States v. Mitchell JanikSeventh Circuit· 1983-12-22· cited 153×
- United States v. Michael Lawrence PollockNinth Circuit· 1984-03-02· cited 138×
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 138×
- United States v. Walter Swiderski and Maritza De Los SantosSecond Circuit· 1977-02-01· cited 131×
- Kennedy v. Bureau of Narcotics & Dangerous Drugs, United States Department of JusticeSupreme Court· 1973-01-08· cited 130×
- United States v. John M. Arruda, United States of America v. Edward RinglandFirst Circuit· 1983-08-12· cited 123×
- United States v. Mark A. MitchellFirst Circuit· 1983-12-29· cited 101×
- United States v. Peter JodoinFirst Circuit· 1982-03-08· cited 100×
- Timothy Leary v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1967-09-29· cited 91×
- United States v. Robert Nick Regilio and Guillermo Saint BlancardSeventh Circuit· 1982-02-18· cited 88×
- United States v. NovakThird Circuit· 1983-08-25· cited 86×
- Boothe v. Greater New York Savings BankSupreme Court· 1979-06-04· cited 86×
- Knight v. National Union Fire Insurance of PittsburghSupreme Court· 1983-03-21· cited 85×
- United States v. Richard Brim, A/K/A SamEighth Circuit· 1980-10-08· cited 82×
- United States v. Daniel Michael Daly, Harold Dean Klemp, Joseph Diaz, Gene Floyd Criswell, and Michael Richard RyanNinth Circuit· 1983-10-04· cited 79×
Other cases named United States v. Rush
26 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- United States v. RushCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2001-01-26· cited 10×
- United States v. RushDistrict of Columbia· 2012-04-10· cited 7×
- United States v. RushE.D. Washington· 1912-04-29· cited 5×
- United States v. RushD. Minnesota· 1973-05-15· cited 5×
- United States v. RushDistrict of Columbia· 2012-12-26· cited 4×
- United States v. RushArmy Court of Criminal Appeals· 1999-09-16· cited 4×
- United States v. RushEighth Circuit· 1987-07-24· cited 3×
- United States v. RushEighth Circuit· 2011-08-15· cited 2×
- United States v. RushS.D. Iowa· 1982-11-26· cited 2×
- United States v. RushE.D. Louisiana· 1963-03-04· cited 2×
- United States v. RushDistrict of Columbia· 1987-11-10· cited 1×
- United States v. RushE.D. New York· 2005-01-19· cited 1×
- United States v. RushFourth Circuit· 2004-06-04· cited 1×
- United States v. RushSeventh Circuit· 1974-07-31
- United States v. RushSixth Circuit· 1981-05-04
- United States v. RushThird Circuit· 1983-01-17
- United States v. RushSixth Circuit· 1983-03-17
- United States v. RushEleventh Circuit· 1986-06-04
- United States v. RushEleventh Circuit· 1988-04-22
- United States v. RushEleventh Circuit· 1991-05-09
- United States v. RushEleventh Circuit· 1992-08-07
- United States v. RushFifth Circuit· 1996-06-25
- United States v. RushM.D. Alabama· 2003-02-20
- United States v. RushM.D. Alabama· 2009-07-14
- United States v. RushFifth Circuit· 2005-12-14
- United States v. RushE.D. Louisiana· 1992-12-10
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.