Skip to main content
· 10/8/1980

United States v. Richard Brim, A/K/A Sam

Citations

  • 630 F.2d 1307
  • 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 13290

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • adopting the district court’s conclusion that “the Act intended automatic exclusion”
  • failure to renew motion for severance at close of government’s case or conclusion of all evidence constituted waiver
  • failure to renew motion for severance at close of government’s case or conclusion of all evidence constituted waiver
  • “The district court considered the theories of each side and concluded that the Act intended automatic exclusion. This interpretation is consistent with the language of the Act, as amended, and with the apparent purpose of the amendment.”
  • fifty-seven days properly excludable pursuant to § 3161(h)(1)(F)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henley, McMILLIAN, Van Pelt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.