Skip to main content
· 1/8/1993

United States v. Glen Butz Danner L. Boone

Citations

  • 982 F.2d 1378
  • 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 182
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 394
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 157
  • 1993 WL 1997

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing the district court’s factual findings regarding speedy trial violations for clear error and questions of law de novo
  • refusing to suppress evidence obtained in violation of state pen register statute
  • “We have 27 upheld the exclusion of time for a continuance to allow 24 1 defense counsel time to prepare motions.”
  • reasonable to grant continuance for large scale conspiracy involving nine 8 defendants, 29-count indictment and “hundreds of hours of tape time”
  • wiretap evidence should not be suppressed where offi- cers relied in good faith on then-existing law in obtaining pen registers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wright, Hug, Poole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.