Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1/26/2001
United States v. Rush
Citations
- 54 M.J. 313
- 2001 CAAF LEXIS 39
- 2001 WL 65590
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- employing Article 59(a) after failing to find constitutional error
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sullivan, Effron, Crawford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. RileyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2013-04-16· cited 72×
- United States v. ForbesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2005-08-25· cited 29×
- United States v. RasnickCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2003-01-17· cited 13×
- United States v. StatonAir Force Court of Criminal Appeals· 2009-11-24· cited 3×
- United States v. GreszlerAir Force Court of Criminal Appeals· 2002-01-25· cited 1×
- United States v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2023-08-10
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1999-06-29· cited 71×
- United States v. GreavesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1997-06-09· cited 49×
- United States v. TuallaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2000-01-31· cited 45×
- United States v. SorianoUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1985-09-16· cited 24×
- United States v. NealUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1968-01-26· cited 5×
- United States v. RushArmy Court of Criminal Appeals· 1999-09-16· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.