United States v. Mark A. Mitchell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, when initial indictment was filed within the thirty-day period, a superseding indictment filed outside the thirty-day window which did not change the original charges did not violate the Speedy Trial Act
• explaining that Congress “recognized that the time limit requirements of the [STA] must be flexible enough to accommodate the practicalities of our adversary system”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).