United States v. James Tunnessen, Douglas Fullerton, and Michael Robert Reape, Defendants

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that subsection (h)(8)(B) is a “nonexclusive” list of factors for the court to consider
• stating that the statute \contains a nonexclusive list of factors for the court to consider in deciding whether to grant a continuance\
• stating that Congress added the ends-of-justice exclusion \to 'avoid the pitfalls of unnecessary rigidity' and provide courts with the discretion to deal effectively with individual cases\
• consideration of relevant factors make clear that abuse of discretion to dismiss with prejudice
• possession of four pounds of cocaine apparently considered serious

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).