Skip to main content
· 1/8/1999

United States v. Rostoff

Citations

  • 164 F.3d 63
  • 1999 WL 1751

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that if the government receives the beneficial interest of a debt, then the FDCPA is a proper collection vehicle
  • failure to pay at the time due renders payment overdue; it does not abate the obligation; restitution order extinguished by satisfaction, not by passage of time
  • denying reh’g and reh'g en banc

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Cyr, Stahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.