· 1/8/1999
United States v. Rostoff
Citations
- 164 F.3d 63
- 1999 WL 1751
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that if the government receives the beneficial interest of a debt, then the FDCPA is a proper collection vehicle
- failure to pay at the time due renders payment overdue; it does not abate the obligation; restitution order extinguished by satisfaction, not by passage of time
- denying reh’g and reh'g en banc
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Torruella, Cyr, Stahl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.