Skip to main content
· 12/20/1990

United States v. Dennis Harotunian

Citations

  • 920 F.2d 1040
  • 1990 WL 192078

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that unless some ex post facto problem interferes, the sentencing court should employ the guidelines in effect at the time of sentencing
  • explaining that the guidelines in effect at the time of sentencing control unless ex post facto considerations prohibit their use
  • explaining that the guidelines in effect at the time of sentencing control unless ex post facto considerations prohibit their use
  • explaining that the guidelines in effect at the time of sentencing control unless ex post facto considerations prohibit their use
  • explaining that the guidelines in effect at the time of sentencing control unless ex post facto considerations prohibit their use
  • explaining that a sentencing court should apply the guidelines in effect on the date of sentencing unless doing so will implicate ex post __ facto concerns

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Bownes, Atkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.