First Circuit· 7/29/1991
United States v. David
Citations
- 940 F.2d 722
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the guidelines apply to a conspiracy that \begins before the guidelines' effective date and continues after the effective date\
- holding that the guidelines apply to a conspiracy that “begins before the guidelines’ effective date and continues after the effective date”
- concluding that defendants did not withdraw from conspiracy because defendants \attempted to resume more active participation . . . by reestablishing their supply relationship [with a coconspirator]\
- noting that “the law is well-settled that a criminal conspiracy can exist despite the eventual failure of .its objective”
- noting that arguments adopted by reference \must be readily transferrable from the proponent's case to the adopter's case\
- noting that \the law is well-settled that a criminal conspiracy can exist despite the eventual failure of its objective\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Campbell, Cyr, Selya
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
169 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. SepulvedaFirst Circuit· 1993-12-20· cited 733×
- United States v. SaccocciaFirst Circuit· 1995-06-28· cited 281×
- United States v. HoffeckerThird Circuit· 2008-06-16· cited 256×
- United States v. ElderSixth Circuit· 1996-09-18· cited 242×
- David v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 1998-01-29· cited 232×
- United States v. InnamoratiFirst Circuit· 1993-06-17· cited 225×
- United States v. HoulihanFirst Circuit· 1996-08-22· cited 222×
- United States v. Marco A. EcheverriFirst Circuit· 1993-01-05· cited 204×
- United States v. John L. St. CyrFirst Circuit· 1992-10-15· cited 188×
- United States v. Antoine D. Washington, United States of America v. Glen Early, Jr., A/K/A William Kevin MarcusD.C. Circuit· 1994-01-14· cited 186×
- United States v. Claude Paul TardiffFirst Circuit· 1992-07-08· cited 163×
- United States v. HurleyFirst Circuit· 1995-07-24· cited 161×
- United States ex rel. LaCorte v. SmithKline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Inc.Third Circuit· 1998-07-23· cited 161×
- United States v. Soto-BeniquezFirst Circuit· 2003-11-20· cited 152×
- United States v. Nelson-RodriguezFirst Circuit· 2003-02-07· cited 149×
- United States v. LaraFirst Circuit· 1999-06-30· cited 142×
- United States v. Rivera-RosarioFirst Circuit· 2002-08-07· cited 142×
- Putnam Resources v. Ronald M. Pateman, Ronald M. Pateman v. Frenkel & Company, Inc.First Circuit· 1992-02-20· cited 141×
- United States v. Ayala-VazquezFirst Circuit· 2014-05-02· cited 141×
- Siedle v. Putnam Investments, Inc.First Circuit· 1998-06-18· cited 134×
Cites
84 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoFirst Circuit· 1990-01-10· cited 2,914×
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-01-18· cited 2,457×
- Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 1,598×
- Garrett v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1985-08-28· cited 1,001×
- United States v. HaldemanD.C. Circuit· 1976-10-12· cited 661×
- United States v. Wilfredo Diaz-VillafaneFirst Circuit· 1989-06-06· cited 426×
- United States v. BoylanFirst Circuit· 1990-03-14· cited 393×
- United States v. Efraim Natanel A/K/A Efriam NatanelFirst Circuit· 1991-07-09· cited 374×
- United States v. Gennaro J. Angiulo, Donato F. Angiulo, Samuel S. Granito, Francesco J. Angiulo and Michele A. AngiuloFirst Circuit· 1990-03-05· cited 334×
- United States v. DeLunaEighth Circuit· 1985-05-10· cited 251×
- Fugate v. Borg Textile Corp.Supreme Court· 1990-04-16· cited 243×
- United States v. DrougasFirst Circuit· 1984-11-07· cited 229×
- United States v. Fausto D. RuizFirst Circuit· 1990-06-05· cited 224×
- United States v. George M. Khoury, Howard Kluver, David W. West, Louis H. ChippasEleventh Circuit· 1990-06-07· cited 220×
- United States v. David Sklar, United States of America v. David SklarFirst Circuit· 1990-12-03· cited 220×
- United States v. William J. CintoloFirst Circuit· 1987-05-01· cited 185×
- United States v. Hector M. Rodriguez-EstradaFirst Circuit· 1989-06-14· cited 181×
- United States v. Pedro M. Gonzalez-Sanchez, United States of America v. Carlos Latorre, United States of America v. Manuel Parrilla-MarquezFirst Circuit· 1987-07-31· cited 179×
- United States v. Barry HoffmanFirst Circuit· 1987-11-06· cited 179×
- United States v. Hector Rivera-Martinez, A/K/A El MenFirst Circuit· 1991-04-26· cited 177×
Other cases named United States v. David
22 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- United States v. DavidD. Nevada· 1991-01-28· cited 17×
- United States v. DavidN.D. Georgia· 1987-06-25· cited 10×
- United States v. DavidE.D. Virginia· 1996-10-25· cited 7×
- United States v. DavidSeventh Circuit· 1939-11-15· cited 6×
- United States v. DavidE.D. New York· 1983-06-13· cited 4×
- United States v. DavidN.D. Ohio· 1958-02-07· cited 3×
- United States v. DavidSecond Circuit· 2012-05-17· cited 2×
- United States v. DavidD.C. Circuit· 2011-11-04· cited 1×
- United States v. DavidNinth Circuit· 1980-08-28
- United States v. DavidNinth Circuit· 1981-04-29
- United States v. DavidSixth Circuit· 1983-01-27
- United States v. DavidThird Circuit· 1984-03-09
- United States v. DavidThird Circuit· 1984-06-19
- United States v. DavidSecond Circuit· 1983-10-13
- United States v. DavidFifth Circuit· 1988-03-08
- United States v. DavidFifth Circuit· 1994-07-21
- United States v. DavidSecond Circuit· 1995-02-23
- United States v. DavidFourth Circuit· 1996-05-06
- United States v. DavidDistrict of Columbia· 2010-03-08
- United States v. DavidNinth Circuit· 2009-06-17
- United States v. DavidNinth Circuit· 2009-06-17
- United States v. DavidNinth Circuit· 2006-08-09
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.