United States v. William A. Dietz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding _____ that sentencing arguments not seasonably advanced below cannot be introduced for the first time on appeal
• explaining that sentencing objections \not seasonably addressed to the trial court may not be raised for the first time in an appellate venue\
• explaining that a party who, in hindsight, finds dissatisfaction with the arguments he advanced in the district court \cannot switch horses mid-stream in hopes of locating a swifter steed\
• emphasizing importance of “width, breadth, scope, complexity and duration of the scheme” in connection with an extensiveness determination
• filing of fraudulent social security and unemployment claims by defendant and three others in seven states over twelve years and involving several governmental agencies and elaborate planning constituted “otherwise extensive” conduct
• affirming district court’s finding 12 that the defendant’s criminal activities were “sufficiently panoramic” to justify the increase

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).