United States v. Bradstreet

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that defendant’s testimony that he did not intend to defraud “strikes us as inherently not subject to characterization as unintentional”
• affirming a criminal <br>conviction for, inter alia, \knowingly falsifying [a company's] <br>books and records in an attempt to conceal [securities] fraud\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).