United States v. Joseph B. Carson, John K. Lanter, Wilbert Hall, Aaron Hall, and Ronald L. Flaugher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• single act of counter-surveillance during drug transaction is sufficient to establish that the defendant joined the conspiracy
• “Allowing the Commissioner to decide the issue again would 10 create an unfair ‘heads we win; tails, let’s play again’ system of disability benefits 11 adjudication.”
• “Allowing the Commissioner to decide the issue again 10 would create an unfair ‘heads we win; tails, let’s play again’ system of disability benefits 11 adjudication.”
• referring to the required relation- ship as “closely monitored and highly regulated”
• referring to the required relation- ship as “closely monitored and highly regulated”
• “the proper course, except in rare circumstances, is 10 to remand to the agency for additional investigation or explanation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).