Skip to main content
· 11/13/1984

United States v. Quema Holloway

Citations

  • 740 F.2d 1373

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[C]ounsel for [the defendant] made no request for... a continuance. In such a circumstance, we conclude that the timing of the disclosure did not prejudice [the defendant].”
  • “It is well settled that the filing of the notice of appeal .. . deprives the district court of jurisdiction to act in matters involving the merits of the appeal.”
  • “It is well settled that the filing of the notice of appeal with the district court clerk deprives the district court of jurisdiction to act in matters involving the merits of the appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Engel, Martin, Contie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.