United States v. Jimmie A. Wynn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Sentencing [the defendant] beyond the statutory maximum plainly violated his right to due process under the[F]ifth [A]mendment to the United States Constitution.\
• sentencing beyond statutory maximum plainly violated right to due process under Fifth Amendment
• “In contrast, legal elements, even when required for culpability, may properly be part of the district court’s statement of the law when it instructs the jury.”
• “In contrast, legal elements, even when required for culpability, may properly be part of the district court’s statement of the law when it instructs the jury.”
• “Our judicial system requires the prosecution to prove facts, not laws.”
• “Our judicial system requires the prosecution to prove facts, not laws. Regarding the presentation of evidence, the phrase ‘judicial notice’ applies to facts, not laws. On the other hand, judges, not juries, determine what is the law.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).