United States v. John Demjanjuk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “we need not decide whether the district court’s ruling was erroneous or whether this is a reviewable issue because if any error occurred it was harmless”
• noting the court’s broad discretion to admit expert witness testimony in a bench trial
• “This Court reviews the admission or exclusion of expert evidence for an abuse of discretion.”
• proceedings commenced 41 years after naturalization
• Nazi German Service Identity Card

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).