· 6/7/1983
United States v. Sadik Xheka and Beha Xheka
Citations
- 704 F.2d 974
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in pro- hibiting questions on cross-examination which would elicit the maximum penalty the witness faced if convicted
- where Brady material has impeachment value only, disclosure on day witness testifies satisfies due process
- statements intended to keep coconspirator in the conspiracy were made in furtherance of the conspiracy
- “The conspiracy continues until defendants obtain the insurance money or abandon their quest.”
- \The conspiracy continues until defendants obtain the insurance money or abandon their quest.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pell, Cudahy, Bonsal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.