Skip to main content
· 7/22/1997

United States v. Jay Daniel Ritter

Citations

  • 118 F.3d 502
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 18821
  • 1997 WL 405901

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding condition of supervised release requiring bank embezzler to notify present and future employers about his conviction
  • upholding a condition requiring the defendant to notify his employer of his embezzlement conviction against the defendant’s First Amendment challenges to the condition
  • discussing permissible limitations on First Amendment rights for persons on supervised release
  • defendant convicted of embezzling from employer was required to notify present and future employers of his past crimes
  • “[I]f primarily designed to meet the ends of rehabilitation and protection of the public, [special conditions implieating fundamental rights] are generally upheld.”
  • “[I]f primarily designed to meet the ends of rehabilitation and protection of the public, [special conditions implicating fundamental rights] are generally upheld.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keith, Kennedy, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.