· 7/22/1997
United States v. Jay Daniel Ritter
Citations
- 118 F.3d 502
- 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 18821
- 1997 WL 405901
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding condition of supervised release requiring bank embezzler to notify present and future employers about his conviction
- upholding a condition requiring the defendant to notify his employer of his embezzlement conviction against the defendant’s First Amendment challenges to the condition
- discussing permissible limitations on First Amendment rights for persons on supervised release
- defendant convicted of embezzling from employer was required to notify present and future employers of his past crimes
- “[I]f primarily designed to meet the ends of rehabilitation and protection of the public, [special conditions implieating fundamental rights] are generally upheld.”
- “[I]f primarily designed to meet the ends of rehabilitation and protection of the public, [special conditions implicating fundamental rights] are generally upheld.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Keith, Kennedy, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.