United States v. Erina S. Martin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court is not required to notify the defendant of her right of self-representation
• indicating that “[t]o assert the right of self- representation, a defendant must do so unequivocally”
• “[P]o-lice officers and probation officers can work together and share information to achieve their objectives.”
• denial of motion made \after the trial was in full swing [was] a fortiori a proper exercise of discretion\
• \A probation officer need not have a warrant to conduct a search of a probationer where the probation officer is properly carrying out her official responsibilities.\
• \[P]olice officers and probation officers can work together and share information to achieve their objectives.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).