Skip to main content
· 8/8/1978

United States v. Richard D. Enright

Citations

  • 579 F.2d 980

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in which this procedure was sanctioned in the more demanding context of a criminal trial
  • twenty three month delay between indictment and trial not sufficient for reversal
  • preponderance standard appropriate on findings triggering the co-conspirator hearsay exception
  • preponderance standard appropriate on findings triggering the co-conspirator hearsay exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peck, Engel, Merritt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.