W.D. New York· 2/17/2009
United States v. Nicolo
Citations
- 597 F. Supp. 2d 342
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11691
- 2009 WL 368302
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Deciding a motion for a preliminary order of forfeiture is part of the sentencing process. As such, the rules of evidence that must be followed in criminal trials do not apply to this proceeding.”
- “[Defendant’s] arguments in this regard, however, are both premature and not his to make, since a defendant does not have standing to object to forfeiture on the grounds that a third party owns the property.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- criminal forfeiture under § 982
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: David G. Larimer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. ContorinisSecond Circuit· 2012-08-17· cited 89×
- United States v. Sum of $70,990,605District of Columbia· 2014-03-04· cited 15×
- United States v. YassD. Kansas· 2009-07-14· cited 5×
- United States v. KingW.D. Oklahoma· 2017-03-06· cited 5×
- United States v. CoffmanE.D. Kentucky· 2012-04-16· cited 5×
- United States v. PatelW.D. Virginia· 2013-01-11· cited 5×
- United States v. NeffE.D. Pennsylvania· 2018-03-29· cited 4×
- United States v. BaileyW.D. North Carolina· 2013-02-25· cited 4×
- United States v. Tdc Mgt. Corp., Inc.District of Columbia· 2017-07-13· cited 3×
- United States v. ParenteauS.D. Ohio· 2011-08-19· cited 2×
- United States v. St. PierreE.D. Louisiana· 2011-08-30· cited 2×
- United States v. JafariW.D. New York· 2015-01-16· cited 1×
- United States v. RobertsE.D. New York· 2010-03-11
- United States v. SwartzN.D. New York· 2019-08-09
- United States v. PatelW.D. Virginia· 2012-08-22
Cites
54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. John VoigtThird Circuit· 1996-07-09· cited 454×
- United States v. Vampire Nation A/K/A Fredrik Von Hamilton A/K/A Frederick Hamilton Banks, Frederick H. BanksThird Circuit· 2006-06-20· cited 232×
- United States v. Robert L. JohnsonTenth Circuit· 1992-07-28· cited 229×
- United States v. Donaciano Hernandez-EscarsegaNinth Circuit· 1989-10-04· cited 219×
- United States v. Craig B. SokolowThird Circuit· 1996-07-26· cited 136×
- United States v. Mauricio Javier PucheEleventh Circuit· 2003-11-12· cited 127×
- United States v. Jeffrey Jay RutgardNinth Circuit· 1997-06-04· cited 122×
- United States v. BrownFifth Circuit· 1999-08-24· cited 98×
- United States v. One Parcel of Real Estate Commonly Known as 916 Douglas Avenue, Elgin, Illinois, Appeal of Paul F. Born, Iii, Claimant-AppellantSeventh Circuit· 1990-07-16· cited 98×
- United States v. BornfieldTenth Circuit· 1998-05-13· cited 92×
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Steven B. Tencer and Ronald Lazar, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesFifth Circuit· 1997-03-10· cited 86×
- United States v. All Assets of G.P.S. Automotive Corp.Second Circuit· 1995-09-18· cited 86×
- United States v. Jerome Genova, Lawrence Gulotta, and Jerome StackSeventh Circuit· 2003-08-18· cited 80×
- United States v. Luiz Ben Zvi and Roz Ben ZviSecond Circuit· 1999-01-21· cited 77×
- United States v. WebberSeventh Circuit· 2008-07-29· cited 77×
- United States v. UddinSecond Circuit· 2009-01-06· cited 72×
- Barbara Pacheco, United States of America v. John Serendensky, A/K/A John Vitolano, Joseph Foti & Guy FotiSecond Circuit· 2004-12-29· cited 70×
- Almont Shipping Co. v. RuffinSupreme Court· 1991-02-25· cited 69×
- United States v. Frank Wiggs BennettThird Circuit· 2005-09-12· cited 68×
- United States v. Braxtonbrown-SmithD.C. Circuit· 2002-02-12· cited 65×
Other cases named United States v. Nicolo
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.