W.D. New York· 2/17/2009
United States v. Nicolo
Citations
- 597 F. Supp. 2d 342
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11691
- 2009 WL 368302
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Deciding a motion for a preliminary order of forfeiture is part of the sentencing process. As such, the rules of evidence that must be followed in criminal trials do not apply to this proceeding.”
- “[Defendant’s] arguments in this regard, however, are both premature and not his to make, since a defendant does not have standing to object to forfeiture on the grounds that a third party owns the property.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- criminal forfeiture under § 982
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: David G. Larimer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.