Skip to main content
W.D. New York· 2/17/2009

United States v. Nicolo

Citations

  • 597 F. Supp. 2d 342
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11691
  • 2009 WL 368302

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Deciding a motion for a preliminary order of forfeiture is part of the sentencing process. As such, the rules of evidence that must be followed in criminal trials do not apply to this proceeding.”
  • “[Defendant’s] arguments in this regard, however, are both premature and not his to make, since a defendant does not have standing to object to forfeiture on the grounds that a third party owns the property.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • criminal forfeiture under § 982

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: David G. Larimer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.