United States v. Parenteau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the relevance of drafting history marginal where plaintiff only asserted that provisions had “potential ambiguity”
• directing parties to confer on disclosure of “rules, policies and guidelines actually relied upon by [the insurer] in disclaiming the coverage at issue in this case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).