· 12/29/2004
Barbara Pacheco, United States of America v. John Serendensky, A/K/A John Vitolano, Joseph Foti & Guy Foti
Citations
- 393 F.3d 348
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 27082
- 2004 WL 2998622
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the government’s forfeiture of real property owned by the defendant in joint tenancy extinguished only the defendant’s interest and not the joint tenant’s
- applying New York law to the question whether the petitioner was a bona fide purchaser for value
- applying New York law to the question whether the petitioner was a bona 11 fide purchaser for value
- “A party’s assertion of fact in a pleading is a judicial admission by which [the party] normally is bound throughout the course of the proceeding.”
- “The purposes of the forfeiture penalty are to punish, deter and disempower criminals, aims which are not farthered by taking an innocent owner’s share.” (citation omitted)
- “At [the ancillary proceeding], both the petitioner and the government are entitled to present evidence, with the burden ultimately on the petitioner to prove her claim by a preponderance of the evidence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Meskill, Miner, Katzmann
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.