United States v. Robert L. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where the fraud consisted of inducing investor to wire funds to defendant’s account, that - 13 - transaction alone cannot also support money laundering charge
• stating that Congress designed the money laundering statute to fill a lacuna “with respect to the post-crime hiding of ill-gotten gains”
• noting that there is no requirement that government, “show that funds withdrawn from the defendant’s account could not possibly have come from any source other than the unlawful activity.”
• stating that Congress designed _______ the money laundering statute to fill a lacuna \with respect to the post-crime hiding of ill-gotten gains\
• noting that there is no requirement that government \show that funds withdrawn from the defendant's account could not possibly have come from any source other than the unlawful activity.\
• noting that there is no requirement that government \show that funds withdrawn from the defendant's account could not possibly have come from any source other than the unlawful activity.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).