United States v. Uddin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that such “‘proceeds’ are not limited to net profits from the crime,” and that “any proceeds directly traceable to food stamp fraud are subject to forfeiture . . .”
• applying § 981(a)(2)(A)’s definition of “proceeds” in a case involving food stamp fraud and conversion of public money
• applying § 981(a)(2)(A)’s definition in a case involving the sale of foodstamps
• applying § 981(a)(2)(A)’s definition in a case involving the sale of foodstamps
• “A district court may make a reasonable estimate by extrapolating the average amount of loss from known data and applying that average to transactions where the exact amount of loss is unknown.”
• “Although there will undoubtedly be situations in which a district court’s estimate of loss amount falls outside the boundaries of reasonableness, we 'need not define precisely what those boundaries are. It is enough that the district court here did not exceed them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).