United States v. Vampire Nation A/K/A Fredrik Von Hamilton A/K/A Frederick Hamilton Banks, Frederick H. Banks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the court’s decision not to recuse sua sponte is reviewed for plain error
• explaining that the scope of an in personam judgment in forfeiture is limited by the provisions of the applicable forfeiture statutes
• explaining that the scope of an in personam judgment in forfeiture is limited by the provisions of the applicable forfeiture statutes
• holding that Rule 32(h) does not apply to sentencing variances
• commenting that “[w]hat has changed post-Booker, is that sentencing is a discretionary exercise”
• differentiating between traditional departures under the Guidelines and variances from the Guidelines based on Booker

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).