First Circuit· 11/8/1993

United States v. Morillo

Citations

8 F.3d 864
1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 28905
1993 WL 444541

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that a \defendant bears the burden of proving entitlement to decreases in the offense level\
explaining that the time limits for taking appeals in criminal cases are \mandatory and jurisdictional\
finding no clear error in denial of additional one-level reduction when defendant waited until the day of jury selection to enter a guilty plea
stating in dicta “it is likely” that when the date of the oral pronouncement differs from the date on which judgment is entered, “sentence is imposed on the date judgment enters, rather than the date sentence is orally pronounced”
defendant’s conditional offer to plead does not qualify as notice under section 3El.l(b)(2) because “the court must still reserve calendar time” until condition is removed
\Facts contained in a presentence report associated with the crime being sentenced.\ Kelly, 1 F.3d at _____ 1143 (emphasis supplied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breyer, Selya, Stahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

141 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Morillo

9 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.