United States v. Jim Clay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a sentence is not imposed until judgment enters, for purposes of Rule 35(c)
• noting city directive instructing police officers who encounter mentally distressed suspects “to wait for back-up” and “to attempt to de-escalate the situation through conversation”
• affirming based on “regular purchases,” transaction size, and “fronting,” among other things
• affirming based on “regular purchases,” transaction size, and “fronting,” among other things
• affirming based on “regular purchases,” transaction size, and “fronting,” among other things
• \ `imposition of the sentence' . . . signifies the date judgment enters rather than the date sentence is orally pronounced\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).