United States v. Armando Mir

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where defendant did not offer any rebuttal evidence to refute presentence report, \district court . . . was free to adopt facts in PSI without further inquiry\
• any unadjudicated conduct considered in determining sentence must be supported by a preponderance of the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).