United States v. Turbides-Leonardo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a lower Guidelines sentencing range “presumably [will result in] a more lenient sentence”
• explaining that “a sentencing court is not required to address frontally every argument advanced by the parties”
• noting that a lower Guidelines sentencing range \presumably [will result in] a more lenient sentence\
• noting that brevity in sentencing “is not to be confused with inattention”
• explaining that an appellant hoping to prevail on plain error review must show “a reasonable probability that, but for the error claimed, the result of the proceeding would have been different” (internal quotation marks and alterations omitted)
• finding no clear or obvious error where defendant seemingly acquiesced to the PSI report and the district court accordingly sentenced the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).