First Circuit· 2/9/2012
United States v. Mare
Citations
- 668 F.3d 35
- 87 Fed. R. Serv. 816
- 2012 WL 400364
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 2551
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that the defendant “could reasonably have gambled that a limiting instruction geared toward an extrinsic-evidence purpose would have done more harm than good” by drawing the jury’s attention to the referenced uncharged crime
- explaining supplementary character of that Rule to the intrinsic-evidence rule; where challenged evidence is intrinsic to crime charged in indictment, Rule 404(b) is “not implicated at all” (internal quotation marks omitted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Torruella, Lipez, Howard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Shervin v. Partners Healthcare System, Inc.First Circuit· 2015-10-09· cited 64×
- United States v. Landron-ClassFirst Circuit· 2012-08-29· cited 35×
- United States v. MensahFirst Circuit· 2013-12-16· cited 30×
- United States v. Vizcarrondo-CasanovaFirst Circuit· 2014-08-18· cited 28×
- United States v. SouzaFirst Circuit· 2014-04-18· cited 26×
- United States v. GreenFirst Circuit· 2012-10-31· cited 19×
- United States v. FordFirst Circuit· 2016-10-14· cited 18×
- United States v. WatsonFirst Circuit· 2012-09-25· cited 17×
- United States v. Robles-AlvarezFirst Circuit· 2017-10-18· cited 16×
- United States v. MonteiroFirst Circuit· 2017-09-15· cited 15×
- United States v. Ortiz-IslasFirst Circuit· 2016-07-11· cited 13×
- United States v. RathbunFirst Circuit· 2024-04-05· cited 11×
- United States v. Castro-CaicedoFirst Circuit· 2014-12-24· cited 8×
- Neece v. City of ChicopeeFirst Circuit· 2024-06-27· cited 7×
- State of Tennessee v. Donnell TunstallCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2015-03-10
- State of Tennessee v. Gregory LivingstonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2025-07-29
- United States of America v. Ian FreemanD. New Hampshire· 2022-11-30
- United States v. GiangFirst Circuit· 2026-04-22
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. John F. Gardiner (05-1247) Ronald Lupo (05-1248)Sixth Circuit· 2006-09-12· cited 290×
- United States v. Lugo GuerreroFirst Circuit· 2008-04-16· cited 219×
- United States v. VaroudakisFirst Circuit· 2000-12-06· cited 148×
- United States v. Eusebio Escobar-De JesusFirst Circuit· 1999-10-05· cited 134×
- Oliver C. Udemba v. Paul NicoliFirst Circuit· 2001-01-10· cited 99×
- United States v. Michael J. Fields, United States of America v. James P. Bramble, United States of America v. Vincent MacPhersonFirst Circuit· 1989-05-12· cited 98×
- United States v. Morales-MachucaFirst Circuit· 2008-10-17· cited 95×
- United States v. Oviedo-VillarmanFirst Circuit· 2003-03-25· cited 84×
- United States v. DunbarFirst Circuit· 2009-01-16· cited 76×
- United States v. UtterEleventh Circuit· 1996-10-16· cited 69×
- United States v. SmithFirst Circuit· 2002-06-11· cited 65×
- United States v. Alejandro Rubio-EstradaFirst Circuit· 1988-09-15· cited 54×
- United States v. Fazal-Ur-Raheman-FazalFirst Circuit· 2004-01-21· cited 44×
- United States v. FanfanFirst Circuit· 2006-11-08· cited 39×
- United States v. Rodriguez-BerriosFirst Circuit· 2009-07-23· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.