United States v. Oviedo-Villarman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding a finding of perjury in part because the jury “must perforce have determined that [the defendant's] testimony was false”
• “The certification procedure is reserved for state law questions that present significant issues, including those with important public policy ramifications, and that have not yet been resolved by the state courts.”
• showing of necessity made under similar circumstanced

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).