Skip to main content
First Circuit· 9/25/2012

United States v. Watson

Citations

  • 695 F.3d 159
  • 89 Fed. R. Serv. 680
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 20128
  • 2012 WL 4351736

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering, in reviewing a 404(b)/403 claim for plain error, whether the government emphasized the challenged evidence during trial
  • finding no unfair prejudice where \the judge explicitly forbade the government from intimating\ an inflammatory inference
  • affirming judicial notice over Rule 403 objection where the notice was \narrowly confined to the material necessary for\ the jury to understand the noticed fact
  • discussing statements made in the prosecution’s rebuttal to Leppo’s closing argument, but describing difficulty of proving prejudice in a way that extends to the Tomasetta affidavit as well

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lynch, Lipez, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.