United States v. Lugo Guerrero

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant “waived his right to ... appeal because he failed to object to the recommendation of the magistrate’s report”
• wheelchair user could only 15 “challenge those barriers that might reasonably affect a 16 wheelchair user’s full enjoyment of the store,” and did not have 17 standing to challenge barriers to someone who is blind
• finding evidence admissible to combat defense theory
• construing Andrade in same way
• subsequent interrogation at different location

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).