United States v. Morales-Machuca

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “non-medical officials are entitled to defer to the 18 professional judgment of the facility’s medical officials” while rejecting allegations of 19 deliberate indifference against non-medical officials who reviewed plaintiff’s 20 administrative grievances
• reviewing the BIA’s findings as to country conditions for substantial 14 evidence and ultimate decision for abuse of discretion
• not specifying whether Hobbs Act robbery was a crime of violence under the force or residual clause
• “[A] district court might appropriately deny a motion for injunctive 24 relief where the injunction would hinder, rather than promote, competition in the market.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).