First Circuit· 6/11/2002

United States v. Smith

Citations

292 F.3d 90
58 Fed. R. Serv. 1028
2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 11098
2002 WL 1262818

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that “defense counsel must typically request a continuance to preserve a claim of prejudice by delayed disclosure of evidence”
noting that “[w]e usually defer to the district court’s balancing under Rule 403 of probative value against unfair prejudice” and factoring the district court’s limiting instruction into the Rule 403 analysis
questioning whether defendant preserved discovery claim where defendant neither asked for a continuance nor moved for a mistrial
“We usually defer to the district court’s balancing under Rule 403 of probative value against unfair prejudice.”
“The defendant must at a minimum make a ‘prima facie’ showing of a plausible strategic option which the delay foreclosed.”
likely waiver where court granted continuance and defense counsel did not request any additional continuances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Lynch, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.