United States v. Eusebio Escobar-De Jesus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the erroneous CCE instruction was harmless where “[t]he evidence introduced to support the separate convictions on the [predicate narcotics violations] also establishes inescapably their relatedness”
• holding that harmless error analysis applies to Richardson CCE instruction error
• affirming that an incident was relevant \as an additional overt act within the conspiracy charged\ because the incident \stemmed from the same conspiratorial agreement to import and distribute cocaine\
• upholding the admission of evidence of bad acts outside the scope of the conspiracy for this purpose
• finding no prejudicial variance between charge that offense occurred in Guayama, Puerto Rico, and proof that it occurred in Guanica, Puerto Rico
• allowing evidence of a prior crime to help demonstrate a relationship of mutual trust

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).