Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 12/13/2011

United States v. Hussein

Citations

  • 664 F.3d 155
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 24617
  • 2011 WL 6188447

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The amount of restitution does not always correspond to guidelines loss because the rules for calculating each dif- fer.”
  • “The amount of restitution does not always correspond to guidelines loss because the rules for calculating each dif- fer.”
  • “The amount of restitution does not always correspond to guidelines loss because the rules for calculating each dif- fer.”
  • defendant argued issue of loss, but waived argument on restitution
  • endorsing method used for Homan and T & T Foods
  • reviewing “oth- erwise extensive” element for clear error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Manion, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.