Seventh Circuit· 2/27/2008

United States v. Caputo

Citations

517 F.3d 935
2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 4167
2008 WL 509177

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

avoiding the First Amendment question where medical device had not been approved for any use and thus “there were no lawful off-label uses to promote.”
affirming the exclusion of testimony “about the meaning of the statute and regulations” and writing: “That’s a subject for the court, not for testimonial experts. The only legal expert in a federal courtroom is the judge.” (citation omitted)
“The ‘expert’ would have testified about the meaning of the statute and regulations. That’s a subject for the court, not for testimonial experts.”
“The only legal expert in a federal courtroom is the judge.”
“The only legal expert in a federal courtroom is the judge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Kanne, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Caputo

14 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.