· 1/17/2008
United States v. Tahzib
Citations
- 513 F.3d 692
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 986
- 101 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 566
- 2008 WL 151136
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a district court is well within its discretion to reject stock arguments during sentencing
- explaining that the bears the burden of proving any factors
- explaining that the defendant bears the burden of proving any mitigating factors
- explaining that defendant bears burden of proving mitigating factors
- categorizing the extent to which the appellant accepted responsibility as a stock argument
- categorizing the extent to which the appellant accepted responsibility as a stock argument
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Posner, Wood, Evans
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.