Skip to main content
· 1/17/2008

United States v. Tahzib

Citations

  • 513 F.3d 692
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 986
  • 101 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 566
  • 2008 WL 151136

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a district court is well within its discretion to reject stock arguments during sentencing
  • explaining that the bears the burden of proving any factors
  • explaining that the defendant bears the burden of proving any mitigating factors
  • explaining that defendant bears burden of proving mitigating factors
  • categorizing the extent to which the appellant accepted responsibility as a stock argument
  • categorizing the extent to which the appellant accepted responsibility as a stock argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Wood, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.