United States v. Hussein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prison 14 officials cannot use valid procedures to obscure retaliatory actions, even if the ultimate result of 15 the procedure is the inmate “end[ing] up where he belonged.”
• finding \very close\ the question of whether sufficient evidence of scienter had been presented to sustain conviction, notwithstanding that the defendant: (1
• noting that unobjected-to jury instruction becomes binding unless plainly erroneous
• noting that unobjected-to jury instruction becomes binding unless plainly erroneous
• finding “very close” the question of whether sufficient evidence of scienter had been presented to sustain conviction, notwithstanding that the defendant: (1
• rejecting the defendant’s fair warning argument as to khat because the underlying offense required that a defending “knowingly or intentionally” possess a controlled substance with intent to distribute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).