Skip to main content
· 10/26/2012

United States v. Ronnanita Fluker

Citations

  • 698 F.3d 988
  • 89 Fed. R. Serv. 1006
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 22219
  • 2012 WL 5275244

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief are waived unless “exceptional circumstances” justify an exception to waiver
  • authenticating email on circumstantial evidence alone where no witness saw the email’s author draft the email
  • finding an email to be authentic based on the sender’s and recipient’s email addresses and the context of the email
  • explaining the importance of identifying the basis of an objection with specificity
  • “Only a prima facie showing of genuineness is required; the task of deciding the evidence’s true authenticity and probative value is left to the jury.”
  • use of the defendant’s e-mail address was circumstantial evidence that the proffered e-mail from the defendant was authentic

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Manion, Tinder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.