· 10/26/2012
United States v. Ronnanita Fluker
Citations
- 698 F.3d 988
- 89 Fed. R. Serv. 1006
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 22219
- 2012 WL 5275244
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief are waived unless “exceptional circumstances” justify an exception to waiver
- authenticating email on circumstantial evidence alone where no witness saw the email’s author draft the email
- finding an email to be authentic based on the sender’s and recipient’s email addresses and the context of the email
- explaining the importance of identifying the basis of an objection with specificity
- “Only a prima facie showing of genuineness is required; the task of deciding the evidence’s true authenticity and probative value is left to the jury.”
- use of the defendant’s e-mail address was circumstantial evidence that the proffered e-mail from the defendant was authentic
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Manion, Tinder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.